Monday, February 13, 2012
On "Villa Monterey Apartment, Burbank" by Meg Pokrass (368 words) ***
Saturday, April 16, 2011
On "My First Serial Killer" by Julie Innis (1484 words) ***
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
On "Finders Keepers" by Ravi Mangla (347 words) ****
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
On "Rod and Gun Club" by Marcelle Heath (655 words) ****
Sunday, December 7, 2008
On "Naming the Giraffe" by Lynn Watson (304 words) ***
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
On "Some Things You Should Know about Me before We Meet" by Josh Honn (1037 words) ****
Monday, June 9, 2008
On "Diary of the Living Dead or: Are You There God? It's Me. Also, a Bunch of Zombies" by Jake Swearingen (1758 words) *****
Monday, May 5, 2008
On "Permanent," by Mary Phillips-Sandy (781 words) ***
Here's a horrifying story, one probably more horrifying than many others that try too hard. It's a simple nightmare--one's teeth begin to fall out. What do you do? Unfortunately, as I've noted in reviews about one sad thing about the Internet preference for shorter rather than longer pieces, the story, doomed to stick to its short word count, seems to simply drop off, so we're left wanting more, left feeling like the last two-thirds of the story isn't here. But it's a great beginning, and the fact that I'd be willing to read something three times this long shows it executes what is here well. Read the story here.
Friday, May 2, 2008
On "The Undiscovered Country, Apparently" by Andrew S. Taylor (1284 words) ****
One of the amazing things about Pindeldyboz is that it comes out every two weeks and always manages to have at least a couple of good stories in it. Some other journals come out four times a year and don't manage to have a single decent story in them. I don't know how Pindledyboz does it--perhaps, it has gained a reputation of publishing fine material. It also helps--and hinders--that the publication limits writers to twenty-five hundred words. Helps insofar as that many words, I find, really is about the limit of my online reading tolerance; after that, I'm likely to click away or resort to printing the thing out. Hinders in that sometimes it seems like writers are constrained by what really is a fairly difficult set of parameters. I mean, how many of the great stories really occur in such a space? Pick up nearly any Flannery O'Connor piece, any Raymond Carver piece (outside of What We Talk about When We Talk about Love), any Chekhov piece, and you're dealing with twice that number of words generally. Andrew S. Taylor's story, I think, may be a case in point. I love this piece. He takes an ordinary situation--a drink falling at a party--and turns it into a strange almost science fiction experiment. Tragedy is averted--or perhaps created. But then, given the need to wrap the story up, the piece, to my mind, fizzles out right at the end (or perhaps, arguably, it goes on a couple of paragraphs too long). But the first nine-tenths of this story is absolutely fantastic. Read the story here.
